高清一级淫片a级中文字幕,亚洲无码免费在线小视频,精品国产群3p交换,国产初次视频观看

China’s recent anti-monopoly probes have attracted widespread attention both at home and abroad. A group of international business lobbies, backed by a number of western governments, have lodged complaints against China.

According to the Wall Street Journal, U.S. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew has sent a letter to Chinese Vice Premier Wang Yang stating that China's recent targeting of foreign companies in its implementation of anti-monopoly law could negatively impact U.S.-China relations.

Should foreign companies in China be given immunity to anti-monopoly investigations? The answer is absolutely no.

More than 100 countries all over the world have anti-monopoly laws – these are regarded as the ‘economic constitution’ in a mature market. China’s anti-monopoly Law deals with the following issues: monopoly agreements, abuse of market dominance, and abuse of administrative power to eliminate or restrict competition.

Companies often try to take advantage of their superiority in production or distribution to gain market dominance. A growing number of enterprises are creating and defending monopolies to grab excess profits, by way of using flaws in the modern intellectual property system. A side effect of the system is that monopoly companies inhibit their competitors from innovation. China, the largest manufacturer in the world, is the biggest victim of the shackles of the system.

Qualcomm owns a series of 3G patents. All companies that are engaged in production and sales related to 3G products have to sign patent licensing agreements with Qualcomm. The company only sells chips for cell phones, but is insisting on charging patent fees based on a percentage of retail prices. Companies who make cell phone screens, batteries, earphones or decorations for cell phones have to pay these fees. China’s manufacturers of 3G mobile phones have to surrender half of their profits to Qualcomm. The revenues Qualcomm earns from China account for 49% of its gross revenues.

Monopolies impose huge costs on consumers and companies. International Cartels grab more profits from developing countries than from developed ones. Developing countries respond by conducting anti-monopoly investigations against international cartels, contributing to a fair international economic environment. Fines from anti-monopoly investigations mainly accrue to developed countries. Millions of dollars in fines have flowed into the national treasuries of European countries and the US, while companies from developing countries have lost heavily without any compensation. Anti-monopoly supervision has to be updated constantly, supported by human and financial resources. Supervision departments in charge of anti-monopoly probes in developing countries are not as sophisticated as those in developed ones. As the second largest economy in the world, China’s supervision department will be updated and become stronger.

This article was edited and translated from《外企不享有反壟斷“豁免權(quán)”（望海樓）》, source: People's Daily Overseas Edition, Author: Mei Xinyu